Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41446735›Full record

ReviewiScience2025

Multiple roles of business for climate action.

Sam Hampton, Andrea Byfuglien, Will Eadson, Briony Latter, Ben Hardy-Jones, Katherine Sugar, Hannah Bamford, Richard Blundel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sam HamptonEnvironmental Change Institute, School of Geography and Environment, University of Oxford, South Parks Rd, Oxford OX1 3QY, UK.
Andrea ByfuglienEnvironmental Change Institute, School of Geography and Environment, University of Oxford, South Parks Rd, Oxford OX1 3QY, UK.
Will EadsonSheffield Hallam University, Howard Street, Sheffield S1 1WB, UK.
Briony LatterEnvironmental Change Institute, School of Geography and Environment, University of Oxford, South Parks Rd, Oxford OX1 3QY, UK.
Ben Hardy-JonesEnvironmental Change Institute, School of Geography and Environment, University of Oxford, South Parks Rd, Oxford OX1 3QY, UK.
Katherine SugarEnvironmental Change Institute, School of Geography and Environment, University of Oxford, South Parks Rd, Oxford OX1 3QY, UK.
Hannah BamfordEnvironmental Change Institute, School of Geography and Environment, University of Oxford, South Parks Rd, Oxford OX1 3QY, UK.
Richard BlundelOpen University Business School, Walton Hall, Kents Hill, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Businesses play a critical role in the fight against climate change. While some businesses-both high-profile and less well-known-are making significant strides, most companies are not sufficiently decarbonizing their operations or contributing toward the broader social and economic changes needed to meet climate goals. In response to scrutiny over "greenwashing", many businesses are becoming cautious about communicating sustainability efforts, a phenomenon known as "greenhushing". This article aims to mainstream business climate action by introducing a new framework that outlines the roles businesses can adopt in addressing climate change. Based on an interdisciplinary literature review and empirical research from the UK, we identify five roles for businesses. While much focus has been on businesses as energy

Indexed as

BusinessClimatologySocial sciences

Identifiers

PMID41446735
PMCPMC12723288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.