ArticleiScience2025
Intratumoral microbiota-derived S1P sensitizes the combination therapy of capecitabine and PD-1 inhibitors.
Article in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spatial niches of the colorectal cancer microbiome: differences, interrelationships, and clinical implications of fecal, mucosal, and intratumoral microbiota.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
- The intratumoral microbiome in colorectal cancer: origins, microenvironmental interactions, and new horizons in precision medicine.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Global research trends and emerging frontiers of intratumoral microbiota in cancer immunotherapy: a bibliometric and visualization analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Global research trends on the gut microbiota and immunotherapy for colorectal cancer: a bibliometric analysis.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Article
- Post-Translational Modifications in Cancer-Associated CD8⁺ T-Cell Exhaustion: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Opportunities.International journal of biological sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clinical responses of colorectal cancer (CRC) treatments vary considerably due to the heterogeneity of tumor microenvironment (TME), where intratumoral microbiota may reshape the unique inflammation imprints. However, its complex mechanistic underpinnings remain incompletely elucidated. Herein, we sought to delineate the critical role of intratumoral microbiota in potentiating combination therapeutics against CRC. By comparing germ-free (GF) and specific pathogen-free (SPF) mouse models of 33 potential CRC treatments, we screened out capecitabine-MIH4 (anti-PD-1 antibody) combination regimen significantly augmented by intratumoral microbiota in tumor regression. The enrichment of enterotoxigenic
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.