ArticleThe Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology2025
Long-Term Effects of Tear Trough Hyaluronic Acid Filler: A Retrospective Study.
Article in The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Case Series on a Layered Biomaterial Strategy for Midface Rejuvenation: Combining Collagen Stimulators and Hyaluronic Acid.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis retrospective study aims to assess the extended efficacy of tear trough hyaluronic acid (TT-HA) filler treatments beyond the commonly reported duration of 6 to 12 months.
methodsA retrospective analysis of 155 patients who received TT-HA filler treatments from 2007 to 2023 was conducted. Patient records and photographs were reviewed, and the severity of infraorbital hollowing was graded using the Merz Infraorbital Hollow Assessment Scale (MIHAS). Multivariate regression models were used to analyze factors influencing treatment longevity.
resultsMost patients were female (84%) with a mean age of 48 years. Moderate-to-severe infraorbital hollowing was most prevalent at baseline. On average, 0.45mL of filler was injected into each infraorbital hollow using a 27 gauge x 1-inch cannula. Various HA filler products were used, including Belotero Balance®, Juvederm Vollure® XC, Restylane®, and Juvederm Volbella® XC. Most patients experienced an improvement in MIHAS grade posttreatment, with significant results persisting at 18 months. Multivariate regression analysis revealed sustained efficacy over time, with no significant differences in MIHAS grade changes between 6, 12, and 18-month follow-up periods.
conclusionThis study challenges conventional beliefs by demonstrating the extended efficacy of TT-HA fillers, providing evidence of significant improvement in infraorbital hollowing up to 18 months posttreatment. These findings offer valuable insights for clinicians and patients, guiding expectations, and treatment planning in cosmetic dermatology practice. Further research is warranted to elucidate factors contributing to the prolonged longevity of TT-HA fillers to optimize treatment outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41446717PMC12724988What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.