ArticleThe Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology2025
Development of a Novel Facial Age Assessment Model in a Multiethnic Population for Evaluation of Topical Anti-Aging Products.
Article in The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical Age-reversal Quantification of a Facial Skincare Regimen with Sirtuin-targeting Ingredients in a Multiethnic Population.The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of this study was to develop a novel validated computational algorithm for calculating facial age based on the key universal parameters of the face and eyes that contribute to facial aging in women, independent of ethnicity and Fitzpatrick skin type.
methodsDigital facial images of women (n=2825) of 4 different ethnicities, across all Fitzpatrick skin types (I-VI), were evaluated and scored on 15 facial aging markers using a 0 to 10 photonumeric scale (0=no sign of aging; 10=severe signs of aging). Least squares linear multiple regression analysis was performed to identify parameters that contribute independently to observable skin aging and to develop a mathematical algorithm to calculate facial age based on these parameters.
resultsThe identified key universal parameters contributing to facial age, independent of ethnicity or skin type, were nasolabial folds, under eye lines, elongated cheek pores, forehead lines, under eye puffiness, uneven skin tone, and marionettes, which explained 71% of the variation in age. All parameters increased with age but at different rates, with forehead and marionette lines showing the largest changes with each progressive decade.
conclusionThe algorithm developed for calculating facial age based on visual assessments of 7 identified key parameters may be an objective method to evaluate the efficacy of topical anti-aging products.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41446715PMC12724982What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.