Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41446710›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2025

Development and preliminary clinical feasibility of a Delphi-based aerobic exercise prescription for children with asthma.

Ying Zhang, Ze Kong, Kaixuan Yang, Zhiqiong Li, Ziye Yu, Longyan Liu, Chenxiao Meng, Jie Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ying ZhangBaoding Hospital of Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, Baoding, China.
Ze KongBaoding Hospital of Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, Baoding, China.
Kaixuan YangCapital University of Physical Education and Sports, Beijing, China.
Zhiqiong LiCapital University of Physical Education and Sports, Beijing, China.
Ziye YuCapital University of Physical Education and Sports, Beijing, China.
Longyan LiuCapital University of Physical Education and Sports, Beijing, China.
Chenxiao MengCapital University of Physical Education and Sports, Beijing, China.
Jie ZhangBaoding Hospital of Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, Baoding, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to develop a clinically applicable aerobic exercise prescription for children with asthma using a two-round Delphi consensus process and to preliminarily evaluate its feasibility and safety of this prescription in a pre-post pilot study. The secondary goal was to explore preliminary signals of changes in exercise capacity, pulmonary function, and asthma control among asthmatic children after implementing the prescription-with consideration of potential confounding factors such as concurrent medication use and inhaler technique retraining-thereby providing preliminary evidence for non-pharmacological interventions in pediatric asthma management. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 10 parents of asthmatic children, 10 medical professionals, and 10 sports rehabilitation experts to develop an initial aerobic exercise prescription based on the FITT (frequency, intensity, time, type) principle. Subsequently, this initial prescription was iteratively refined through two rounds of Delphi consultation involving 17 experts (specializing in pediatric pulmonology, pediatric nursing, and exercise rehabilitation). A consensus threshold of ≥75% agreement and authority metrics were predefined, and item-level expert feedback was used to modify the prescription. Finally, a 12-week prospective outpatient pilot study was conducted, including 15 asthmatic children aged 6-14 years who implemented the finalized prescription. Feasibility (recruitment rate, exercise adherence), safety (asthma-related adverse events), and clinical outcomes [6 min walk distance (6MWD), spirometry, Childhood Asthma Control Test (C-ACT)] were measured. Results: For the Delphi process, all 17 experts completed both rounds of consultation, with an effective response rate of 94.44% in Round 1 and 100% in Round 2. The expert authority coefficient (Cr) was 0.86, and the coefficient of variation (CV) for item importance scores decreased across rounds (from 0.07-0.16 in Round 1 to 0.07-0.13 in Round 2), indicating high expert consensus. For the pilot study, the recruitment rate reached 100%, and the average weekly exercise adherence was 2.7 ± 0.3 sessions. The incidence of asthma-related adverse events was 13.3% (mild wheezing and coughing), which did not interrupt training. Post-intervention outcomes showed significant improvements: 6MWD increased from 510.07 ± 31.96 to 539.27 ± 44.52 m ( Conclusions: The aerobic exercise prescription developed via the Delphi method is feasible and safe for short-term application in children with asthma, with preliminary signals of potential improvements in exercise capacity, pulmonary function, and asthma control. Notably, these observations may be influenced by confounding factors, including concurrent asthma medication adherence and standardized inhaler technique retraining. Due to the small sample size and uncontrolled pre-post design of the pilot study, definitive conclusions on efficacy or independent intervention effects cannot be drawn.

Indexed as

aerobic exercise prescriptionasthmatic childrenDelphi methodevaluationqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID41446710
PMCPMC12722912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.