ArticleClinical case reports2026
Severe Craniocerebral Injury in a Child Caused by Repetitive Cleaver Strikes: Case Report and Review of the Literature.
Article in Clinical case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Severe Craniocerebral Injury in a Child Caused by Repetitive Cleaver Strikes: Case Report and Review of the Literature.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Severe craniocerebral injuries are rare in the pediatric population, especially open craniocerebral injuries caused by repeated slashes with sharp instruments. Here, we report an exceptional case of a child with severe open craniocerebral injury caused by repeated chopping blows with a cleaver. The child was admitted with traumatic hemorrhagic shock, and a multidisciplinary team (MDT) was immediately organized for evaluation and treatment decisions. Preoperative imaging showed a comminuted skull fracture accompanied by extensive scalp laceration and brain tissue injury with active hemorrhage. Emergency surgery included debridement, hemostasis, removal of the comminuted skull fragments, and dural repair. After surgery, the child was closely monitored in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) and received systematic rehabilitation. Three months later, the child underwent a second-stage cranial repair to restore the integrity of the skull and improve the appearance of the head. At the 6-month follow-up, the child's neurological function had gradually recovered, with no significant cognitive or motor deficits. This case highlights the critical role of MDT management strategies in pediatric severe open craniocerebral injuries, including preoperative evaluation, surgical intervention, and postoperative rehabilitation, in order to optimize the child's prognosis and minimize the risk of complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.