Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41446594›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of women's health2025

Women's Right to Surgical Self-Consent: A Legal and Moral Imperative for Somalia.

Rahmo Mohamed Ali

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Rahmo Mohamed AliFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Simad University, Dr Sumait Hospital, Mogadishu, Benadir, Somalia.ORCID 0009-0003-2556-3870

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Somalia, the cultural requirement for male family authorization before surgical procedures even in emergencies remains a silent but deadly barrier to timely care. This practice, particularly in obstetric emergencies such as caesarean section, delays life-saving interventions, heightening risks for mothers and newborns. Evidence from Somaliland shows that nearly half of prolonged caesarean section delays are due to family decision-making for consent, with a measurable increase in severe maternal outcomes. This article is presented as a policy commentary aimed at highlighting the impact of current consent practices on women's health and proposing feasible reforms. Respectfully, this commentary urges lawmakers, healthcare leaders, and community elders to consider a compassionate reform that enshrines a woman's right to make informed decisions about her own health. By aligning policy with both ethical medical practice and Islamic principles of preserving life, Somalia can move toward a safer, more equitable maternal health system. This commentary recommends five key actions: legally affirming women's right to self-consent, enabling emergency presumed consent when delays endanger life, introducing advance antenatal consent to prevent avoidable delays in emergencies, engaging communities to build understanding and acceptance, and strengthening provider training to support respectful and timely decision-making.

Indexed as

health policymaternal mortalitypatient autonomySomaliawomen’s health

Identifiers

PMID41446594
PMCPMC12722398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.