ArticlePalliative medicine reports2025
Assessing the Impact of an Indigenous Palliative Care Nurse Navigator: A Program Evaluation.
Article in Palliative medicine reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Indigenous peoples in Canada face significant health disparities rooted in colonization and experience inequitable access to palliative care. Patient navigation has proven effective in both Indigenous and palliative contexts, but integration of these roles has not been studied. This evaluation defines the scope of a patient navigator specializing in palliative care for Indigenous peoples and explores how it addresses service gaps. Methods: A program evaluation tool was developed to track key performance indicators (KPIs) of an Indigenous Palliative Care Nurse Navigator (IPCNN) over six months. Responsibilities were organized into three domains: (1) social vulnerabilities, (2) mainstream palliative care navigation, and (3) barriers to palliative care for Indigenous peoples. Sixteen categories further captured the scope of responsibilities. KPIs were classified as either "working" indicators, reflecting activities undertaken for future outcomes, or "outcome" indicators, which tracked the achievement of results. A single IPCNN provided care to 164 Indigenous patients across Alberta, Canada with a prognosis of less than 24 months, conducting initial assessments and maintaining ongoing contact through home visits, clinic appointments, and phone calls every two to four weeks. KPIs were tabulated and analyzed by frequency (low, moderate, and high), domain, category, and classification. Results: One IPCNN logged 714 activities across three domains: social vulnerabilities (191), mainstream palliative care navigation (394), and barriers to palliative care for Indigenous peoples (129). Most KPIs (77%) were "working" activities, reflecting upstream tasks required to achieve outcomes. The majority of KPIs addressing barriers to palliative care for Indigenous peoples were high-frequency activities. Discussion: The IPCNN role supports Indigenous patients to navigate gaps in palliative care delivery, including distrust of health care providers, jurisdictional challenges, and incongruencies between Indigenous culture and Western medicine. These findings underscore the potential of Indigenous palliative care navigation as an effective intervention to improve the accessibility and quality of palliative care for Indigenous peoples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.