Observational studyFrontiers in public health2025
Development and validation of risk prediction models for high-risk patients with non-traumatic acute abdominal pain: a prospective observational study.
Observational study in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of non-traumatic acute abdomen in elderly patients.World journal of emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Evaluating the Diagnostic Value of Clinical and Laboratory Parameters in Older Adults with Abdominal Pain: A Retrospective Analysis of CT Predictors.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Risk factors for mis-triage between medical and surgical causes in emergency patients with non-traumatic abdominal pain: a retrospective study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study develops and validates a machine learning-based model to help triage nurses identify high-risk patients with non-traumatic acute abdominal pain, enhancing accuracy and safety. Patients and methods: Utilizing information technology, a data collection form was embedded into the electronic pre-triage systems of the emergency departments in two tertiary general hospitals (Shanghai Tongren Hospital and the First Affiliated People's Hospital of Soochow University). Data from 3,090 patients were prospectively collected and preprocessed. Predictive factors for non-traumatic acute abdominal pain were screened through univariate analysis, LASSO regression, and multivariate analysis. Risk early warning models were constructed using seven methods based on R software and externally validated at different time points. Results: The incidence of high-risk patients with non-traumatic acute abdominal pain was 14.49%. Ten predictive factors were identified: (1) age, (2) mode of admission, (3) history of heart disease, (4) history of tumor, (5) MEWS score ≥5, (6) trigger being post-coital, (7) knife-like pain, (8) accompanied by abdominal distension and fullness, (9) tenderness, and (10) muscle tension. All seven predictive models demonstrated good predictive performance, among which the random forest model (AUC = 0.786) showed the best overall predictive performance. External validation results indicated that the logistic regression model had good extrapolation and generalization ability. In this study, the logistic regression model was visualized using a nomogram. Conclusion: Machine learning models were developed for early risk prediction in non-traumatic acute abdominal pain; random forest showed the best discrimination, while logistic regression with a nomogram offered superior clinical applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.