SynthesisFrontiers in public health2025
A meta-analysis of the dose-response relationship between aerobic exercise and executive function in children.
Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: While existing meta-analyses of executive function focus on older adults and clinical pediatric populations, a substantial gap remains regarding typically developing children during this critical period. Our meta-analysis elucidates the dose-response relationship between aerobic exercise and executive function in this group, providing an evidence-based framework for exercise prescription and translational research. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted to retrieve 4,135 relevant articles examining the impact of aerobic exercise on children's executive function from multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, China Biology Medicine Database (CBM), CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP. The search period spanned from the inception of each database to December 2024. The quality of the included literature was assessed using the ROB 2 tool, and data analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4 and Stata 16 software. Furthermore, the GRADE evidence quality evaluation tool was employed to assess the outcome indicators of the included studies. Results: A total of 19 articles were ultimately included, consisting of 17 English-language articles and 2 Chinese-language articles. All studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving a total of 18,650 children. The results indicated that the standardized mean differences (SMD) for the effects of aerobic exercise interventions on children's inhibitory control, working memory, and cognitive flexibility were as follows: SMD = 0.06, 95% CI (-0.09, -0.03) for inhibitory control; SMD = -0.01, 95% CI (-0.04, -0.02) for working memory; and SMD = -0.02, 95% CI (-0.01, -0.05) for cognitive flexibility. According to the GRADE evidence quality assessment, the three outcome indicators (inhibitory control, working memory, and cognitive flexibility) were rated as moderate quality. Conclusion: Single acute aerobic exercise sessions lasting less than 30 min demonstrate the most significant improvement in executive function among children aged 6 to 8 years. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42025631031, identifier (CRD42025631031).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.