ArticleCureus2025
Audit of Shoulder Dystocia Management and Outcomes at a Busy Hospital in the United Kingdom: A Comprehensive Analysis of Contemporary Practice.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundShoulder dystocia (SD) represents one of the most challenging obstetric emergencies, with potentially devastating consequences for both mother and neonate. Despite advances in obstetric care and standardized management protocols, SD remains largely unpredictable and continues to pose significant clinical challenges. This comprehensive audit aimed to evaluate the incidence, risk factor profile, management strategies, and maternal-neonatal outcomes of SD cases at a UK district general hospital.
methodsA retrospective observational audit was conducted of all documented SD cases occurring between January 1, 2022, and December 31, 2022, at Princess Royal University Hospital, Orpington, UK. Cases were identified through multiple sources, including electronic patient records, delivery suite logbooks, and dedicated SD proformas. Comprehensive data extraction encompassed maternal demographics, antenatal risk factors, intrapartum characteristics, management interventions, and short-term outcomes. Statistical analysis employed descriptive statistics, chi-squared tests, and independent t-tests with significance set at p<0.05.
resultsFifty-six cases of SD were identified from 4,247 vaginal deliveries, yielding an incidence of 1.32%. The cohort demonstrated a mean maternal age of 33.6±4.9 years, a mean BMI of 25.4±4.7 kg/m², and a mean gestational age of 39.9±1.3 weeks. Birth weight averaged 3,811±425 grams, with 67.9% of neonates weighing ≥3,500 g and 32.1% exceeding 4,000 g. Identifiable maternal risk factors were present in 69.6% of cases, with previous macrosomia (19.6%) and diabetes mellitus (17.9%) being most prevalent. Emergency response protocols were activated in 98.2% of cases, with the McRoberts manoeuvre combined with suprapubic pressure employed as first-line management in 80.4% of instances. Maternal complications occurred in 53.6% of cases, predominantly postpartum haemorrhage (7.1%) and perineal trauma requiring repair. Neonatal complications affected 83.9% of cases, with resuscitation requirements (26.8%) and transient respiratory difficulties being most common. Neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission was required in 3.6% of cases, with no cases of permanent brachial plexus injury documented.
conclusionThis audit demonstrates SD management aligned with contemporary guidelines, achieving favourable outcomes through prompt recognition and structured intervention protocols. The findings underscore the importance of multidisciplinary training, standardised response algorithms, and continuous quality improvement initiatives in optimising maternal and neonatal outcomes following SD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.