ArticleCureus2025
Examination of the Communication Environment When Applying Removable Dentures as Wearable Devices.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Using removable dentures as wearable devices will be beneficial for patients at home. This study aimed to clarify the communication environment when applying integrated circuit (IC) tags to removable dentures, considering the effects of saliva, encapsulation depth, and encapsulation materials. Methods Fifteen specimens were made for each encapsulating depth (4.5 mm, 5.0 mm, 5.5 mm, 6.0 mm), and the IC tags were encapsulated in various dental materials. Reading and writing were performed on the IC tags, and the number of test specimens that could communicate at each depth before and after immersion was calculated. Results In the control group, which was not encapsulated in dental materials, communication was feasible up to a depth of 5.5 mm in all test specimens, but communication was unfeasible at 6 mm. In all other materials, communication was feasible up to an encapsulation depth of 5.0 mm in all test specimens, regardless of immersion in artificial saliva, but communication was unfeasible at depths of 5.5 mm or more. Conclusions The encapsulation depth of the IC tag and the dental materials used for encapsulating the tag affected communication capability, but immersion in artificial saliva did not. The possibility of using removable dentures as wearable devices is thus suggested.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.