ArticleCureus2025
Defining 'Normal' Liver Function Tests.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- MRI-Derived Evaluation of Liver Function and Its Extension to K-Edge Photon-Counting CT: Focus on Gadolinium-Based Functional Biliary Imaging.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Chronic liver disease often remains undiagnosed until cirrhosis develops, with standard liver function tests (LFTs) sometimes appearing normal despite significant hepatic dysfunction. Aim To investigate and analyze index liver function tests (LFTs), hematological parameters, and secondary care clinical correlates in patients with confirmed cirrhosis to better understand the clinical utility of LFTs. Methods A retrospective, single-center observational study was conducted on 251 randomly selected patients from a total of 563 with confirmed cirrhosis. Diagnosis was confirmed radiologically or histologically. Patients with clinically evident liver disease were excluded. Data included LFTs, full blood count, international normalized ratio (INR), and albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score. Subgroup analysis was performed comparing those with normal vs. abnormal LFTs. Results Of the 251 patients, 37% had 'normal' LFTs, increasing to 48% among those without clinical correlates. The aspartate aminotransferase (AST): alanine transaminase (ALT) ratio was 1.5 for the full cohort and 1.29 for those with normal LFTs. The ALBI score was normal in 59.1% of the total cohort and in 83.3% of the normal LFT subgroup. These findings indicate that standard LFTs alone may miss a significant proportion of cirrhotic patients, particularly those with compensated disease. Conclusion A substantial proportion of cirrhotic patients presented with normal LFTs, highlighting the limitations of relying solely on these tests for diagnosis. The use of additional clinical indicators and non-invasive tools may enhance early detection. These findings underscore the need for a more comprehensive and multi-parametric approach in evaluating and managing cirrhotic patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.