ArticleCureus2025
Validity of Moyers and Tanaka-Johnston Prediction Methods for Mixed Dentition Analysis in the Pediatric Population of Central Maharashtra: A Cross-Sectional Validation Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Accurate prediction of the mesiodistal widths of unerupted permanent canines and premolars is essential for mixed-dentition space analysis and orthodontic planning. The Moyers' probability tables and the Tanaka-Johnston regression equations are widely used, yet their accuracy across different Indian subpopulations remains uncertain. Aim To assess and compare the validity of Moyers' and Tanaka-Johnston's prediction methods for estimating the combined mesiodistal widths of unerupted canines and premolars in children from the Central Maharashtra population. Methods This cross-sectional validation study included 40 children aged 6-11 years in mixed dentition. Mesiodistal tooth widths were measured directly on dental casts using a pointed divider and millimeter scale, while the arch perimeter was recorded using 0.5-mm stainless-steel ligature wire. Predicted values were obtained using Moyers' percentile tables (95th percentile for both sexes) and the Tanaka-Johnston equations. The primary outcome was the mean bias (Available - Predicted, mm). Secondary outcomes included the SD of bias, Bland-Altman limits of agreement, the proportion of predictions within ±1 mm and ±2 mm, and Cohen's dz. Statistical analyses used paired t-tests and Bland-Altman plots (p < 0.05). Results Both methods demonstrated close agreement with actual measurements at the group level. Moyers' method slightly underestimated mandibular widths by a mean difference of 1.18 mm and nearly matched maxillary values (-0.15 mm). Tanaka-Johnston, on the other hand, showed minimal bias in both arches (≤0.27 mm). Despite non-significant mean differences (all p > 0.05), Bland-Altman limits indicated substantial individual variability. Conclusion Moyers' and Tanaka-Johnston's analyses provide acceptable mean accuracy for Central Maharashtra children but limited reliability for individual predictions. Region-specific regression models are recommended to improve orthodontic diagnostic precision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.