ArticleJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open2026
ISOBAR Implementation for Patient Handover Between Rescue Services and Pediatric Emergency Department Staff: The COPTER-PED Trial.
Article in Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Miscommunication is a major contributing factor to adverse events in medical care, highlighting the importance of thorough patient handover-especially in complex settings like pediatric emergency medicine. This study evaluates the effects of adopting the ISOBAR handover protocol for transfers from emergency medical services to pediatric emergency department (PED) staff. Methods: We conducted a single-center implementation trial to evaluate the ISOBAR handover protocol's efficacy in a German university hospital's PED. The procedure was based on the previous COPTER study. We observed 107 handovers, comparing those conducted using the ISOBAR protocol with those following standard procedure without a protocol. The trial was organized into 4 consecutive phases, alternating between interventional periods. The primary outcome measure was the "Key Information Transfer Efficiency" (KITE) score. The secondary outcome measure was how PED personnel retained key information after the handover. Results: By the end of the study, the amount of key information transferred during the handover had increased by 22%. PED physicians remembered 16% and PED nurses 10% more key information. KITE reflected the course of the implementation. However, full adherence to the ISOBAR protocol did not have a significant effect on the outcome measures. Conclusion: Although the use of ISOBAR can improve the exchange of information during handover in the PED, strict adherence to the protocol is not essential. What really matters is high-quality communication throughout the entire patient handover process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.