Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41446425›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open2026

ISOBAR Implementation for Patient Handover Between Rescue Services and Pediatric Emergency Department Staff: The COPTER-PED Trial.

Vincent Bietke, Sebastian Lang, Tabea Maass, Thomas Lehmann, Birgitta Hucke, Melanie Rohmann, Hans Proquitté, Jan-Christoph Lewejohann, Matthias Nuernberger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Vincent BietkeDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany.
Sebastian LangDepartment for Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany.
Tabea MaassDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany.
Thomas LehmannCentre for Clinical Studies (ZKS), Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany.
Birgitta HuckeDepartment of Pediatrics, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany.
Melanie RohmannDepartment of Pediatrics, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany.
Hans ProquittéDepartment of Pediatrics, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany.
Jan-Christoph LewejohannDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany.
Matthias NuernbergerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Miscommunication is a major contributing factor to adverse events in medical care, highlighting the importance of thorough patient handover-especially in complex settings like pediatric emergency medicine. This study evaluates the effects of adopting the ISOBAR handover protocol for transfers from emergency medical services to pediatric emergency department (PED) staff. Methods: We conducted a single-center implementation trial to evaluate the ISOBAR handover protocol's efficacy in a German university hospital's PED. The procedure was based on the previous COPTER study. We observed 107 handovers, comparing those conducted using the ISOBAR protocol with those following standard procedure without a protocol. The trial was organized into 4 consecutive phases, alternating between interventional periods. The primary outcome measure was the "Key Information Transfer Efficiency" (KITE) score. The secondary outcome measure was how PED personnel retained key information after the handover. Results: By the end of the study, the amount of key information transferred during the handover had increased by 22%. PED physicians remembered 16% and PED nurses 10% more key information. KITE reflected the course of the implementation. However, full adherence to the ISOBAR protocol did not have a significant effect on the outcome measures. Conclusion: Although the use of ISOBAR can improve the exchange of information during handover in the PED, strict adherence to the protocol is not essential. What really matters is high-quality communication throughout the entire patient handover process.

Indexed as

interdisciplinary communicationISOBARpatient handoffpatient handoverpatient safetypediatric emergency departmentpediatric emergency medicine

Identifiers

PMID41446425
PMCPMC12723129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.