ArticleEcology and evolution2025
Flyway-Scale Assessment of Habitat Suitability and Key Environmental Drivers for Waterbirds in Southern China.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bridging policy and practice: implementation of emerging infectious disease risk assessment in China from a One Health perspective.Science in One Health · 2026Article
- Flyway-Scale Assessment of Habitat Suitability and Key Environmental Drivers for Waterbirds in Southern China.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Climate change and anthropogenic activities have caused widespread loss and degradation of waterbird habitats, posing a critical global conservation challenge. This study focuses on eastern and southern China, specifically the area south of the 800 mm isohyet, and examines 47 waterbird species. Using the MaxEnt species distribution model, we integrated multi-source environmental variables-including climate, topography, vegetation, land use, and population density-to evaluate the habitat suitability of different ecological groups and identify spatial gaps in the current protection system. The results reveal a clear coastal-to-inland gradient in the distribution of suitable habitats, with high-suitability hotspots concentrated in coastal regions and radiating inland along major river systems. Distinct ecological groups respond differently to environmental factors: NDVI and DEM were identified as key environmental factors for gulls and shorebird, which prefer low-elevation, sparsely vegetated open habitats, while herons and large wading birds are more strongly associated with densely vegetated landscapes. Some groups, such as herons, show broader ecological adaptability, whereas shorebird tend to rely on more specialized habitat types. Spatial overlay analysis indicates a significant mismatch between existing nature reserves and high-suitability areas, with particularly low protection coverage in southern and southwestern regions, highlighting the need for urgent ecological intervention. Our study reveals structural spatial deficiencies in current waterbird habitat conservation efforts and emphasizes the need for landscape-scale conservation strategies, including wetland restoration, habitat corridor planning, and reserve network optimization, to improve the capacity of protected areas to support waterbird diversity and migratory connectivity. The findings provide valuable data support and spatial planning recommendations for future conservation management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.