ArticleEcology and evolution2025
Honey Bee Colony Health in Thiamethoxam-Treated Sugar Beet Fields: A Field-Based Case Study.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Honey Bee Colony Health in Thiamethoxam-Treated Sugar Beet Fields: A Field-Based Case Study.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Emergency use of thiamethoxam seed treatments in sugar beet was approved in Germany in 2021, despite EU restrictions on neonicotinoids because of pollinator risks. During the field experiment underlying this case study, residues in bee-relevant matrices were detected only at very low levels, and conservative exposure modeling indicated no acute or chronic concern for honey bees. Building on these exposure findings, the present analysis examined whether such exposures translated into measurable effects on honey bee colony performance. In Experiment 1, colony development was monitored at two geographically distinct sites across the 2021 sugar beet season. Colonies at both sites exhibited strong seasonal growth. Generalized linear mixed models detected no consistent adverse effects of thiamethoxam treatment on either adult bee populations or brood cell numbers. Although temporal fluctuations and site-specific variability were evident, treatment effects were not statistically supported, highlighting the importance of multi-site approaches when assessing pesticide impacts and the need for continued multi-year evidence under diverse environmental conditions. In Experiment 2, survival of individual workers was evaluated using free-flying mini-hives. Mixed-effects Cox modeling, which accounted for colony variance, found no significant differences in worker longevity between treated and control groups. This indicates no evidence for reduced worker survival under a field-relevant neonicotinoid exposure scenario. Together, these two complementary experimental approaches show that thiamethoxam seed treatments in sugar beet did not cause consistent adverse effects on honey bee colonies under the tested agricultural conditions. By integrating residue analyses, statistical modeling, and colony-level monitoring, the study provides ecologically relevant evidence that current agricultural practices with thiamethoxam in sugar beet pose a low apparent risk to honey bee colony health, while underscoring the value of longer-term and broader-scale field evaluations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.