Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41446347›Full record

ArticleZooKeys2025

A digitization workflow of dry-pinned collections of Lepidoptera.

Laurel Kaminsky, Stacey Huber, Trudi Deuel, Ngoc-Nhu V Tran, Erin Jane Howard, Aaron Leopold, Anupama Priyadarshini, David Plotkin, Akito Y Kawahara

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in ZooKeys, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Laurel KaminskyMarston Science Library, Smathers Libraries, University of Florida, 444 Newell Drive, Gainesville, Florida 32608, USA University of Florida Gainesville United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0786-8350
Stacey HuberMarston Science Library, Smathers Libraries, University of Florida, 444 Newell Drive, Gainesville, Florida 32608, USA University of Florida Gainesville United States of America.
Trudi DeuelMarston Science Library, Smathers Libraries, University of Florida, 444 Newell Drive, Gainesville, Florida 32608, USA University of Florida Gainesville United States of America.
Ngoc-Nhu V TranMarston Science Library, Smathers Libraries, University of Florida, 444 Newell Drive, Gainesville, Florida 32608, USA University of Florida Gainesville United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2555-2958
Erin Jane HowardMarston Science Library, Smathers Libraries, University of Florida, 444 Newell Drive, Gainesville, Florida 32608, USA University of Florida Gainesville United States of America.
Aaron LeopoldMarston Science Library, Smathers Libraries, University of Florida, 444 Newell Drive, Gainesville, Florida 32608, USA University of Florida Gainesville United States of America.
Anupama PriyadarshiniMarston Science Library, Smathers Libraries, University of Florida, 444 Newell Drive, Gainesville, Florida 32608, USA University of Florida Gainesville United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-2009-5940
David PlotkinMarston Science Library, Smathers Libraries, University of Florida, 444 Newell Drive, Gainesville, Florida 32608, USA University of Florida Gainesville United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2339-655X
Akito Y KawaharaMarston Science Library, Smathers Libraries, University of Florida, 444 Newell Drive, Gainesville, Florida 32608, USA University of Florida Gainesville United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3724-4610

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Butterflies and moths (Lepidoptera) are one of the most commonly found insect groups in museum collections. Yet many specimens still lack digital data and few digitization workflows are available. Here we present a digitization workflow for natural history collections that can be widely applicable for any museum or dried pinned-specimen collection of Lepidoptera. Our workflow consists of pre-imaging preparation, usage of a copy stand for imaging pinned specimens and data labels, image processing, and transcription, the latter two which utilize Python scripts for optimization.

Indexed as

Butterflycopy standdigitizationimagingmothmuseum

Identifiers

PMID41446347
PMCPMC12723396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.