ArticleDigital health
Machine learning prediction model for 28-day mortality among hepatic failure patients complicated by acute respiratory distress syndrome.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Hepatic failure is a common and severe condition among intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Its complication with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is consistently associated with poor clinical outcomes and a significant disease burden. Early identification of high-risk patients is essential for improving clinical outcomes. This study aimed to develop and validate a machine learning (ML) model to predict 28-day mortality in ICU patients with hepatic failure complicated by ARDS. Methods: Data were extracted from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV database, focusing on patients with hepatic failure complicated by ARDS. The cohort was randomly divided into an 80% training set and a 20% validation set. Six ML algorithms were applied to analyze clinical characteristics. Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) were used to interpret the optimal model. Results: A total of 884 patients with hepatic failure and concurrent ARDS were included, with a 28-day mortality rate of 47.4%. Random forest models demonstrated superior performance, achieving an area under the curve of 0.823 (95% confidence interval: 0763-0.883) in the validation set. SHAP analysis identified eight clinically significant predictors of mortality, ranked by importance: age, neutrophil count, pulse transit time, direct bilirubin, heart rate, fibrinogen, serum sodium concentration, and prothrombin time. SHAP enhanced model interpretability, supporting clinical decision-making and potentially improving patient outcomes. Conclusions: ML approaches exhibited promising performance in predicting 28-day mortality among hepatic failure patients complicated by ARDS. These models may aid in guiding treatment decisions for patients with hepatic failure patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.