Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41446334›Full record

ReviewInnovative surgical sciences2025

Recent advances in operative techniques for pancreatic surgery.

Johanna Strotmann, Verena Tripke

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Innovative surgical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Johanna StrotmannDepartment of General and Visceral Surgery, St. Josef Hospital Bochum, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Verena TripkeDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Pancreatic resections are one of the most complex operations in visceral surgery, characterized by high perioperative morbidity and mortality. Continuous evaluation and adjustment of surgical techniques and approaches are required to improve the quality of surgery and outcomes in this highly vulnerable collective of patients. Content: In this short narrative review we will discuss exemplary three recent advances in pancreatic surgery. Summary and Outlook: A systematic literature search was performed using the PubMed database. The three discussed promising developments in pancreatic surgery are the triangle operation, a radical resection of lymphatic and nerve tissue in patients with pancreatic cancer, autologous patches for covering skeletonized arteries after resection to reduce frequent postoperative complications, and minimal invasive surgical approaches, which offer potential benefits in reduced intraoperative blood loss, shorter hospital stay and lower rate of wound infections compared to open resections. These three new operative approaches represent promising advances in a demanding surgical field. However, further studies are needed to confirm the benefits of these techniques on patient outcomes.

Indexed as

pancreatic cancerpancreatic surgerypostoperative pancreatic fistularobotic surgery

Identifiers

PMID41446334
PMCPMC12724681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.