ReviewInnovative surgical sciences2025
The role of simulation in mastering highly specialized pediatric surgery: current trends and future perspectives.
Review in Innovative surgical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Experiences and barriers in pediatric colorectal surgery training: results from the TEPS/EUPSA survey.Pediatric surgery international · 2026Article
- Mind the Gap: A Nationwide Analysis of Case Distribution, Resident Exposure and Institutional Variation in German Pediatric Surgery Training.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Navigating complexity - how innovation shapes the future of surgery.Innovative surgical sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The acquisition of surgical skills in highly specialized pediatric surgical procedures - particularly the management of rare congenital anomalies - poses significant educational challenges. Traditional training models relying on apprenticeship and intraoperative exposure are often insufficient due to the rarity and complexity of such conditions. Simulation-based training offers a structured, reproducible, and risk-free environment to practice and refine surgical techniques. This scoping review examines the current landscape of simulation in pediatric surgery, focusing on anorectal malformations (ARM), esophageal atresia (EA), Hirschsprung's disease (HD) and congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH). A dual search strategy was applied: a systematic literature search via PubMed and a structured online search via Google for commercially available simulation models. A range of models was identified across the four index conditions, including low-fidelity, high-fidelity, hybrid, and animal tissue-based simulators. EA and CDH showed the highest diversity in simulation tools, supporting both open and minimally invasive approaches. Several of the models we identified have demonstrated face, content and construct validity, but systematic data on learning outcomes and user satisfaction remain scarce. While low-fidelity models are useful for basic skill acquisition, high-fidelity and hybrid simulations more closely replicate the operative environment and enhance decision-making and technical proficiency. However, access to high-fidelity simulators remains limited due to cost and resource constraints. By identifying current limitations and opportunities of simulation training, this scoping review provides insights into how the sustainable training of the next generation of pediatric surgeons can be mastered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.