ReviewInnovative surgical sciences2025
Pelvic insufficiency fractures in the elderly - what insights has the past year of research brought? A narrative review.
Review in Innovative surgical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Navigating complexity - how innovation shapes the future of surgery.Innovative surgical sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pelvic insufficiency fractures (PIFs) are low-energy fractures typically occurring in osteoporotic bone and are associated with significant morbidity, reduced quality of life, and increased mortality. PIF requires individualized, often interdisciplinary treatment strategies combining surgical, conservative, and systemic approaches. This narrative review aims to summarize recent findings on the diagnosis, management, and outcomes of PIFs and place them in the context of existing literature. For this purpose, a selective literature search was conducted in January 2025 to identify publications on the topic of PIFs. The search was performed on PubMed and clinical studies addressing the diagnosis, treatment, outcomes and complications of PIFs from January 2024 to 2025 were selected for evaluation. A total of 11 studies with a total of 27,672 patients were included in this review. The findings emphasise the significant morbidity, mortality and healthcare burden associated with these fractures. Conventional radiography frequently fails to detect this type of fracture, thus necessitating advanced imaging techniques such as computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to ensure an early diagnosis. The treatment decision is determined by the stability of the fracture, presence and intensity of pain, and the patient's mobility levels. The treatment options, whether conservative or surgical, are adapted to these factors. The osteoporotic fracture (OF) Pelvis Score has emerged as a promising tool for guiding therapeutic strategies, though there is still potential for further development in the use of pharmaceutical treatment of underlying conditions such as osteoporosis. Despite the advances that have been made, the existing literature remains heterogeneous, underscoring the importance of conducting prospective studies and developing evidence-based guidelines. Interdisciplinary and orthogeriatric care is important for improving outcomes for this vulnerable patient group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.