Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41446275›Full record

ArticleJournal of pathology informatics2025

Contrasting low- and high-resolution features for HER2 scoring using deep learning.

Ekansh Chauhan, Anila Sharma, Amit Sharma, Vikas Nishadham, Karan Vrajlal Padariya, Asha Ghughtyal, Ankur Kumar, Gurudutt Gupta, Anurag Mehta, C V Jawahar and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pathology informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ekansh ChauhanCentre for Visual Information Technology, International Institute of Information Technology, Hyderabad 500032, Telangana, India.
Anila SharmaDepartment of Pathology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute & Research Centre, New Delhi 110085, Delhi, India.
Amit SharmaCentre for Visual Information Technology, International Institute of Information Technology, Hyderabad 500032, Telangana, India.
Vikas NishadhamDepartment of Pathology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute & Research Centre, New Delhi 110085, Delhi, India.
Karan Vrajlal PadariyaCenter for Computational Natural Sciences and Bioinformatics, International Institute of Information Technology, Hyderabad 500032, Telangana, India.
Asha GhughtyalDepartment of Pathology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute & Research Centre, New Delhi 110085, Delhi, India.
Ankur KumarDepartment of Pathology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute & Research Centre, New Delhi 110085, Delhi, India.
Gurudutt GuptaDepartment of Pathology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute & Research Centre, New Delhi 110085, Delhi, India.
Anurag MehtaDepartment of Pathology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute & Research Centre, New Delhi 110085, Delhi, India.
C V JawaharCentre for Visual Information Technology, International Institute of Information Technology, Hyderabad 500032, Telangana, India.
P K VinodCenter for Computational Natural Sciences and Bioinformatics, International Institute of Information Technology, Hyderabad 500032, Telangana, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer, the most common malignancy among women, requires precise detection and classification for effective treatment. Among immunohistochemistry (IHC) biomarkers, HER2 plays a critical role in guiding therapy decisions. In particular, a recent clinical trial has shown that 3-way classification of HER2 (0, low, and high) using IHC is essential for identifying patients with HER2 low expression who may benefit from new targeted therapies. However, traditional IHC classification relies on the expertise of pathologists, making it labor-intensive and prone to significant inter-observer variability. To address these challenges, this study introduces the India Pathology Breast Cancer Dataset, comprising HER2 IHC slides from 500 patients, with a primary focus on automating 3-way HER2 classification. Evaluation of multiple deep learning models revealed that an end-to-end ConvNeXt network using low-resolution IHC images achieved an F1 score of 83.52%, representing an improvement of 5.35% over patch-based methods. Class-wise F1 scores were 75.6% for HER2-0, 82.4% for HER2-low, and 91.5% for HER2-high, indicating the challenge in distinguishing HER2-0 and HER2-low cases. This study highlights the potential of simple yet effective deep learning techniques to significantly improve accuracy and reproducibility in breast cancer classification, supporting their integration into clinical workflows for better patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Deep learningDigital pathologyHER2-low breast cancerImmunohistochemistry

Identifiers

PMID41446275
PMCPMC12723012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.