ArticleJournal of pathology informatics2025
Contrasting low- and high-resolution features for HER2 scoring using deep learning.
Article in Journal of pathology informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer, the most common malignancy among women, requires precise detection and classification for effective treatment. Among immunohistochemistry (IHC) biomarkers, HER2 plays a critical role in guiding therapy decisions. In particular, a recent clinical trial has shown that 3-way classification of HER2 (0, low, and high) using IHC is essential for identifying patients with HER2 low expression who may benefit from new targeted therapies. However, traditional IHC classification relies on the expertise of pathologists, making it labor-intensive and prone to significant inter-observer variability. To address these challenges, this study introduces the India Pathology Breast Cancer Dataset, comprising HER2 IHC slides from 500 patients, with a primary focus on automating 3-way HER2 classification. Evaluation of multiple deep learning models revealed that an end-to-end ConvNeXt network using low-resolution IHC images achieved an F1 score of 83.52%, representing an improvement of 5.35% over patch-based methods. Class-wise F1 scores were 75.6% for HER2-0, 82.4% for HER2-low, and 91.5% for HER2-high, indicating the challenge in distinguishing HER2-0 and HER2-low cases. This study highlights the potential of simple yet effective deep learning techniques to significantly improve accuracy and reproducibility in breast cancer classification, supporting their integration into clinical workflows for better patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.