ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Regarding Emitter Positioning for Nanoflow Electrospray Ionization.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nanoflow electrospray ionization is commonly used for proteomics due to its high sensitivity. Signal intensity, however, is dependent on optimal emitter positioning relative to the mass spectrometer inlet. Here, we characterize the effect of varied emitter positions on peptide signal intensity in all three dimensions using emitters and flows consistent with standard proteomic analyses. We observe improved signal robustness to x/y variations at increasing z distances and demonstrate that positioning within 1 to 2 mm of the optimal location will maintain consistent signal. Signal intensity behavior is consistent across the m/z range, suggesting a certain level of analyte-independence for proteomics analyses. These results provide insight for proteomics researchers using nanoflow LC-MS/MS.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.