ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Multicenter HFpEF study identifies sex disparity linked with two discrete cardiac proteomic signatures.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is epidemic, with an incidence exceeding that of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Sex differences in HFpEF phenotype have been observed, particularly linked to aging and metabolic comorbidities in women. Here, we report a multi-centre proteomic analysis of HFpEF and HFrEF cardiac samples. Using tissues and clinical data derived from multiple institutional biobanks, in-depth characterization of the proteome of ventricular samples was undertaken. Relative to HFrEF, the HFpEF cohort exhibited minimal proteome composition overlap and pronounced heterogeneity. A key finding of this investigation is that sex per se did not confer a distinctive proteomic HFpEF signature. Rather, two HFpEF proteomic profiles were identified, differing significantly in sex ratios. The identification of two Clusters revealed that HFpEF has two predominant proteomic signatures at the molecular level, marked by differences in the extent and nature of structural and contractile machinery and by local cellular and ECM communications. Upstream regulator analysis identified various molecular leads to be pursued in defining these two HFpEF profiles. Our findings offer specific opportunities for new exploration of therapeutic options to target the spectrum of HFpEF proteomic diversity and identify potential drug targeting prospects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.