Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41446015›Full record

ReviewAnimal welfare (South Mimms, England)2025

A framework to refocus the conversation around the welfare of UK purebred cats.

Claire Roberts, Rae Foreman-Worsley, Dan G O'Neill, Jennifer L McDonald

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animal welfare (South Mimms, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Claire RobertsFeline Welfare and Operations Directorate, Cats Protection, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0790-0664
Rae Foreman-WorsleyFeline Welfare and Operations Directorate, Cats Protection, UK.
Dan G O'NeillThe Royal Veterinary College Department of Pathobiology and Population Sciences, UK.
Jennifer L McDonaldFeline Welfare and Operations Directorate, Cats Protection, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previously, consideration of purebred cat welfare has focused heavily on links between specific breeds and their predispositions to disease, extreme morphology, and behavioural traits. While these are certainly important to consider, negative messaging about purebred cats is often poorly evidenced and can be alienating to owners and breeders, with consequent limited or even negative welfare gain. Negative focus on individual breeds also risks overlooking the wider picture, where propagation of genetic traits that impinge upon welfare should be avoided across all cats (

Indexed as

Animal welfarebreedingcatsextreme conformationpedigreepurebred

Identifiers

PMID41446015
PMCPMC12722057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.