ReviewCureus2025
Current Concepts in Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Arthroplasty: A Review of the Perioperative Pathway.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence Applications in Implant Positioning, Dislocation Risk Prediction, and Surgical Indications in Orthopaedic Surgery.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Orthopaedics: Clinical Performance, Limitations, and Translational Readiness-A Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) in arthroplasty care enhances preoperative planning, intraoperative preparation, and postoperative management across hip and knee replacement pathways. Preoperatively, AI recognizes implant designs on plain radiographs, supports revision planning, and can estimate the hip joint center, improving measurements and logistics for complex cases. Clinically, models assist with patient selection and risk stratification, helping forecast readmission or reoperation and guiding resource use. Postoperatively, supervised and ensemble learning predict complications, pain trajectories, dissatisfaction, attainment of minimally clinically important differences in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and even prolonged opioid use, enabling earlier, personalized interventions. Reported benefits include faster, more accurate implant identification for revision surgery and tailored care pathways that can reduce time and cost in typically older, comorbid populations. However, widespread adoption requires rigorous external validation, transparent performance reporting, and reproducible evaluation standards to ensure models are calibrated, transportable, and safe across settings. Overall, the evidence indicates that integrating AI with clinical and imaging data can streamline decisions from preoperative risk assessment to postoperative follow-up, while highlighting the need for stronger multicenter studies, data standards, and governance to translate promising results into reliable, equitable clinical tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.