ArticleCureus2025
Management of Ankle Fractures: Does the Timing of Surgical Intervention Have an Impact on Patient Outcomes?
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Orthopaedic surgeons frequently manage patients presenting with an ankle fracture. It has been observed that these injuries can be present in both young and elderly patients. Surgical intervention with open reduction and internal fixation is often performed for unstable ankle fractures. Methods This study was performed at a district general hospital in the United Kingdom and is a retrospective cohort study. The electronic database was reviewed from January 2021 to December 2024 to identify and review the notes for the patients to be included in the study. After identifying the patients, they were divided into two groups. The patients who had surgical intervention in less than 10 days were allocated to the early surgery group, and the patients who had surgery at day 10 or after day 10 of the injury were allocated to the delayed surgery group. Results Overall, 96 patients were included in this study, where 29 (30.21%) had early surgical intervention and 67 (69.79%) had delayed surgical intervention. The results were not statistically significant for patient outcomes between the two groups. A correlation was observed between the age of the patients and the length of hospital stay. Conclusion At present, there is no definitive consensus with regards to the optimal timing for surgical intervention of ankle fractures. The results of this study highlight that there was no significant difference for post-operative complications between the two groups, which is consistent with the literature. A study with a larger sample size is required to analyse the long-term patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.