Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41445984›Full record

ArticleCurrent psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.)2026

I'm still here and my opinion matters: a scoping review on the experience of epistemic injustice among people living with dementia.

Lara Calabrese, Marco Brigiano, Martina Quartarone, Ilaria Chirico, Sara Trolese, Francesca Lambiase, Ludovica Forte, Alice Annini, Lisa Bortolotti, Rabih Chattat

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lara CalabreseDepartment of Psychology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2779-4309
Marco BrigianoDepartment of Psychology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Martina QuartaroneDepartment of Psychology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Ilaria ChiricoDepartment of Psychology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Sara TroleseDepartment of Psychology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Francesca LambiaseDepartment of Psychology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Ludovica ForteDepartment of Psychology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Alice AnniniDepartment of Psychology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Lisa BortolottiDepartment of Philosophy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Rabih ChattatDepartment of Psychology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 226603
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epistemic injustice refers to wrongs done to individuals in their capacity as knowers, often due to prejudice or stereotypes. People living with dementia (PLWD) are particularly vulnerable to epistemic injustice due to the cognitive, emotional and social aspects of their condition and this could negatively affect their quality of life. This scoping review aims to map the available evidence on how epistemic injustice can influence the experience of PLWD. By adopting the PRISMA and Joanna Briggs Institute guidance for scoping reviews, we included peer-reviewed and grey literature in English that describe the relation between the presence of epistemic injustice (

Indexed as

DementiaEpistemic injusticeKnowledgeParticipationScoping review

Identifiers

PMID41445984
PMCPMC7618523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.