ArticleFrontiers in neuroergonomics2025
Attentional demands during walking are increased by small simulated leg length discrepancy.
Article in Frontiers in neuroergonomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Leg length discrepancy (LLD) is known to disrupt gait symmetry and affect motor control. However, the effects of LLD-induced gait asymmetry on attention functions during walking remain unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the impact of simulated LLD and walking track on attentional demands and gait parameters in young, healthy adults. Methods: This prospective study included participants who completed walking trials on straight ( Results: LLD significantly increased RT and step-time ratio compared to zero LLD. However, the circular walking track did not significantly affect RT or step-time ratio. LLD also significantly increased trunk movement asymmetry (RMS ratios). No significant interaction effects were found for all variables. Conclusion: Simulated LLD significantly increased attentional demands and gait asymmetry, although the rise in attentional demands was limited in healthy participants. The circular walking track had minimal effects and did not exacerbate the challenges associated with LLD. These results provide insights into the effects of gait asymmetry caused by the degree of LLD and walking environment on human gait strategy and its associated attentional demands.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.