ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering2025
An Intrinsically Explainable Approach to Detecting Vertebral Compression Fractures in CT Scans via Neurosymbolic Modeling.
Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neuro-symbolic artificial intelligence in medicine.Nature biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Intelligent control of robotic X-ray devices using a language-promptable digital twin.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) are a common and potentially serious consequence of osteoporosis. Yet, they often remain undiagnosed. Opportunistic screening, which involves automated analysis of medical imaging data acquired primarily for other purposes, is a cost-effective method to identify undiagnosed VCFs. In high-stakes scenarios like opportunistic medical diagnosis, model interpretability is a key factor for the adoption of AI recommendations. Rule-based methods are inherently explainable and closely align with clinical guidelines, but they are not immediately applicable to high-dimensional data such as CT scans. To address this gap, we introduce a neurosymbolic approach for VCF detection in CT volumes. The proposed model combines deep learning (DL) for vertebral segmentation with a shape-based algorithm (SBA) that analyzes vertebral height distributions in salient anatomical regions. This allows for the definition of a rule set over the height distributions to detect VCFs. Evaluation of VerSe19 dataset shows that our method achieves an accuracy of 96% and a sensitivity of 91% in VCF detection. In comparison, a black box model, DenseNet, achieved an accuracy of 95% and sensitivity of 91% in the same dataset. Our results demonstrate that our intrinsically explainable approach can match or surpass the performance of black box deep neural networks while providing additional insights into why a prediction was made. This transparency can enhance clinician's trust thus, supporting more informed decision-making in VCF diagnosis and treatment planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.