ArticleSouth Asian journal of cancer2025
ESGO Quality Indicators for Surgical Management of Cervical Cancer: An Audit of Compliance of a Tertiary Care Center.
Article in South Asian journal of cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This article assesses the compliance of surgical management of carcinoma cervix, to the quality indicators for treatment put forth by the European Society of Gynaeacological Oncology (ESGO), at a tertiary care center. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis and audit of data collected from electronic medical records of patients with carcinoma cervix who underwent surgical management in the department of gynecologic oncology from June 1, 2017 to May 31, 2020. Results: Compliance to all 15 quality indicators under 5 categories was assessed. The first two structural indicators were met. The mean number of parametrectomies was 24 and all were operated by a specialist. With regard to targets addressing overall management, only 46% cases were preoperatively planned in multidisciplinary team meetings and 74% met the target of required preop investigations. There was deficiency in recording pertinent intraoperative details and postoperative pathological information. On assessing the quality of surgical care, there were no postoperative urological fistula, but 18% had involved surgical margins, 16% were upstaged postsurgery, and 15% had recurrence within 2 years. All were counseled about fertility-sparing technique when relevant but only 7% had undergone lymph node staging as per recommendations and 51% had received adjuvant chemoradiation. Conclusion: This audit revealed that the department did not meet the ESGO quality standards published in 2020. The department has implemented structural and procedural changes to meet these standards and a plan to continuously assess compliance to the same.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.