Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41445881›Full record

ArticleSouth Asian journal of cancer2025

Practice of L-Asparaginase Usage: A Survey among Healthcare Providers Treating Children with Cancer in India.

Archana Mv, Kalasekhar Vs, Vinay Munikoty, Ramitha R Bhat, Atul Achyutrao, Vani Lakshmi R, Vasudeva Bhat K

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in South Asian journal of cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Archana MvDivision of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Manipal Comprehensive Cancer Care Centre, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Kalasekhar VsDepartment of Pediatric Oncology, Regional Cancer Centre, Trivandrum, Kerala, India.ORCID 0000-0002-3796-8782
Vinay MunikotyDivision of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Manipal Comprehensive Cancer Care Centre, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Ramitha R BhatDivision of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Manipal Comprehensive Cancer Care Centre, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Atul AchyutraoDivision of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Manipal Comprehensive Cancer Care Centre, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Vani Lakshmi RDepartment of Data Science, Prasanna School of Public Health, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Vasudeva Bhat KDivision of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Manipal Comprehensive Cancer Care Centre, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.ORCID 0000-0002-4081-1372

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: L-asparaginase is an essential chemotherapeutic agent in the therapy of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), which has led to improvement in survival. In low- and middle-income countries like India, the outcomes in ALL are inferior compared with the published literature, one of the causes of which is believed to be due to the inferior quality of bioequivalent asparaginase. Objective: The following survey attempts to understand the practice of using this agent among oncologists treating children with cancer in our country. Methods: The researchers designed a structured online questionnaire comprising 25 aspects of L-asparaginase usage in the study. The questionnaire was directed to the healthcare providers involved in treating children with cancer in India. Results: Of the total 80 responses recorded, 51 (64%) respondents had more than 5 years of experience in pediatric oncology and were treating at least 5 to 10 newly diagnosed ALL patients per month. Forty-one (51%) respondents utilized native asparaginase, and 21 (26.3%) oncologists used PEGylated-asparaginase exclusively. The most common route of administration was the intramuscular route (66.3%). Seventy percent of respondents utilized native form at a dose of 10,000 IU/m Conclusion: This survey shows a wide variation in L-asparaginase usage among healthcare providers caring for children with cancer in our country. As L-asparaginase is the pivotal component of ALL therapy, uniformity in its usage and dosing with the possibility of monitoring SAA due to the quality of bioequivalent may be one of the critical steps toward improving outcomes in ALL in our country.

Indexed as

asparaginaseoncologistspediatric ALL

Identifiers

PMID41445881
PMCPMC12727031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.