ArticleNeurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.)2025
Neural Predictors for the Generalization of Semantic and Phonological Treatment to Discourse Performance in Chronic Post-Stroke Aphasia.
Article in Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recovery of language function in post-stroke aphasia is affected by many variables, including aphasia severity, age, lesion site and size, and brain health. Semantic and phonological therapies are often used to target naming abilities, and when successful their benefits can extend to discourse production, which has emerged as a promising task to evaluate language processing and recovery in aphasia. Here, after characterizing the lesion and white matter integrity predictors for discourse production before treatment, we asked whether brain integrity at baseline is predictive of treatment generalization to discourse. In a large sample of participants with chronic aphasia (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.