ArticleArXiv2025
Design of a minimal, allosteric, and ATPase-like machine using mechanical linkages.
Article in ArXiv, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ATPases cyclically convert chemical energy in the form of ATP gradients into directed motion inside cells. To function, ATPases rely on allosteric communication between at least two binding sites-an internal signaling mechanism that is not well understood. Here, we model an ATPase-like machine by using a system of mechanical linkages to recreate negative allosteric coupling between two binding sites and generate cycles in which the sites alternate occupancy. The ATPase analog has two mechanical degrees of freedom and two discretized binding sites: one for the ATP, Pi and ADP analogs, and one for an allosteric effector analog. The geometry of the ATPase analog allows stepwise binding reactions at each site to capture the two degrees of freedom in a mutually exclusive way. Consequently, the enzyme interconverts between multiple rigid and partially rigid forms, such that neither site can be fully bound when both sites are occupied. Two mechanisms work together to generate an enzymatic cycle: one, in which the tighter-binding ATP analog can bind and displace the effector from the enzyme; and a second, in which flexibility introduced by splitting the ATP analog into two pieces (catalysis) allows the effector to rebind and displace the products (ADP analog). We show that cleavage (forward catalysis) and ligation (reverse catalysis) alter the rigidity of the enzyme complex equivalently to binding and dissociation, respectively, but must do so more slowly for effective cycling to take place. Simple designs for synthetic systems that mimic ATPase monomers can be derived from this work.
Identifiers
41445811PMC12723784What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.