ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Case Report: Solitary scalp metastasis after surgery for invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Breast cancer is one of the most common malignancies among women, and more than 90% of breast cancer-related deaths attributed to metastasis. Cutaneous metastases are relatively uncommon, and scalp involvement is exceedingly rare. Because of its atypical clinical presentation, scalp metastasis is often recognized and diagnosed only after a delay. Case presentation: We report the case of a 45-year-old woman diagnosed with invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) of the right breast with ipsilateral axillary lymph node involvement (clinical stage cT4bN3M0). The patient received six cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and achieved a partial response (PR) according to RECIST 1.1 criteria. Subsequently, she underwent a right simple mastectomy with axillary lymph node dissection. Pathology demonstrated a Miller-Payne grade 3 response, with metastases identified in all 13 dissected axillary lymph nodes (13/13). Immunohistochemistry (IHC) revealed estrogen receptors (ER) and progesterone receptors (PR) positivity, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) expression of 0, and Ki-67 expression of 20%. She subsequently received adjuvant radiotherapy and endocrine therapy. Surveillance imaging during follow-up showed no evidence of recurrence or distant metastasis. In December 2023, the patient developed a painless, round, skin-colored nodule on the left frontal scalp, accompanied by diffuse right periorbital edema and headache. Over the following year, she was evaluated in dermatology, neurosurgery, and oncology clinics. However, breast cancer metastasis was not initially suspected, resulting in misdiagnosis and delayed treatment. In April 2025, fine-needle aspiration of the scalp nodule confirmed metastatic carcinoma. IHC showed ER and PR positivity, HER2 expression of 1+, and Ki-67 expression of 35%. No additional metastatic lesions were identified. The patient was started on systemic therapy with fulvestrant plus dalpiciclib, and after four cycles, she achieved marked regression of the scalp lesion along with resolution of periorbital edema. The most recent examination, however, detected meningeal and calvarial metastases. Consequently, the patient received localized radiotherapy to these sites while continuing the original treatment protocol. Conclusion: This case highlights the diagnostic challenges of atypical scalp metastases in breast cancer and underscores the importance of early detection and prompt initiation of comprehensive treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.