ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
CT-based explainable machine learning for predicting benign and malignant thyroid nodules: a multi-center study.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interpretable machine learning for Parkinson's disease diagnosis, staging, and biological mechanism exploration: a multicenter analysis.BioData mining · 2026Article
- From explainability to clinical actionability: translating artificial intelligence models into decision support for endocrine disease management.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study intends to construct a CT-based explainable machine learning model for preoperative prediction of thyroid nodule benignity or malignancy, aiming to provide a more accurate tool for clinical decision-making and management. Materials and methods: A retrospective study included 370 patients with thyroid nodules confirmed by pathology from three centers, divided into a training set ( Results: A total of 17 features were ultimately selected for Rad_Score calculation. The combined model demonstrated the best performance, with the LR combined model achieving AUC values of 0.962, 0.913, and 0.914 in the training set, internal validation set, and external validation set, respectively, all higher than the LR clinical model and LR radiomics model; and the LR combined model outperforms the SVM combined model (0.953, 0.885, and 0.842). The SHAP analysis revealed the relative importance of the key feature (Rad_score) in model prediction, enhancing model transparency. Conclusion: The combined model performs better under the LR algorithm. Combined with SHAP explainable analysis, it provides a non-invasive, efficient, and transparent tool for preoperative differentiation of benign and malignant thyroid nodules, potentially optimizing individualized clinical management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.