Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41445714›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2025

Patient attitudes toward HPV self-sampling and community health worker-delivered cervical cancer screening services in an underserved area.

Mrithula Suresh Babu, Monica L Kasting, Natalia M Rodriguez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mrithula Suresh BabuDepartment of Public Health, College of Health and Human Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-8918-9549
Monica L KastingDepartment of Public Health, College of Health and Human Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Natalia M RodriguezDepartment of Public Health, College of Health and Human Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2633-4397

Funding

Community-based Participatory Design of an HPV rapid diagnostic test for cervical cancer screening in South FloridaK01CA241073 · NCI · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI RODRIGUEZ, NATALIA MARIA · 2019 to 2023
$916k
NCI NIH HHS K01 CA241073
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: In Indiana, Black women had 12% higher cervical cancer incidence, and 21% higher mortality compared to White women during the years 2008-2017. Human Papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling delivered by community health workers (CHW) has demonstrated potential to increase cervical cancer screening rates among at-risk populations. This study aims to understand patient attitudes toward HPV self-sampling and CHW-delivered screening. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional online survey among patients from three Planned Parenthood clinics in Lake County, IN, which has one of the highest cervical cancer mortality rates in Indiana. Patients' willingness to self-sample and to receive health education and services related to cervical cancer screening from CHWs was analyzed using logistic regression. Results: In the final sample ( Conclusion: Our results showed Black patients had higher willingness for HPV self-sampling and CHW delivery of cervical cancer screening services. Study findings can be used to inform future CHW-led interventions for outreach, education, and delivery of self-sampling interventions to increase cervical cancer screening rates among Black women in underserved areas.

Indexed as

cancer screeningcervical cancercommunity health workershuman papillomavirusSelf-sampling

Identifiers

PMID41445714
PMCPMC12722056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.