ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2025
Structured Data Management and Sharing Plan (DMSP) templates outperformed non-structured ones in an institutional implementation of the NIH Data Management and Sharing (DMS) policy.
Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: The National Institutes of Health Data Management and Sharing (DMS) policy (NOT-OD-21-013) mandates the submission of a Data Management and Sharing Plan (DMSP) for all NIH-funded research that generates scientific data. However, little information is available about how academic medical centers have implemented the policy. Objectives: The study aimed to characterize our institution's implementation of the DMS policy and compare structured versus unstructured approaches to producing policy-conformant DMSPs. Methods: We monitored all NIH grant submissions from our institution for 18 months, evaluating policy implementation through DMSP completeness and reviewer comments during the Just-in-Time period. A rubric was developed to assess whether each required DMSP element and sub-element was addressed. Eight DMSP templates (three NIH-provided, five institutionally developed) and two categories of investigator-created DMSPs were scored. Researchers' feedback was collected through surveys and interviews. Results: 79.3% of submitted DMSPs addressed all NIH-required DMSP elements. Element-level compliance ranged from 98.9% (data type) to 82.7% (tools and software). Sub-element scores showed greater variability, with 98.9% completion for data description and 49.3% for data generation. Unstructured DMSPs consistently underperformed compared to structured DMSPs. Survey and interview feedback, along with reviewer comments, reinforced these findings. Conclusion: A notable 20.7% of DMSPs omitted one or more required elements, indicating a need for improved DMS policy conformance. Structured DMSP templates demonstrated greater alignment with NIH policy. We recommend using structured templates to enhance the quality and consistency of data management and sharing plans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.