ArticleEvidence-based practice in child and adolescent mental health2025
Informing Suicide Risk Assessment Practices of High-Risk Preteens: Qualitative Insights from Youth and Caregivers.
Article in Evidence-based practice in child and adolescent mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: This study marks the first phase of the development of a reliable and valid suicide risk assessment tool for preteen youth. In this phase, authors sought to understand the lived experiences of preteens with suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STBs) and their caregivers, with the goal of informing our understanding and improving the assessment of STBs in preteens. Method: We conducted qualitative interviews with youth in acute care settings who had onset of STBs during their preteen years (i.e., 8-12 years of age; Results: Youth and caregivers provided perspectives on the lived experiences of preteen STBs, identifying critical risk factors and warning signs (e.g., increasing isolation, major shifts in typical behaviors), barriers to communication of risk (e.g., fear of hospitalization, fear of punishment), importance of family-centered and individualized risk assessment that takes into consideration personal and cultural identities (e.g., minoritized identities, religious beliefs), and ways to better support preteens (e.g., asking direct questions about STBs, checking in on mood and well-being more regularly). Conclusion: Qualitative interviews provided valuable insights regarding the lived experiences of preteens reporting STBs and their caregivers. This research highlights the need for family-centered, individualized, and culturally sensitive approaches to understanding, assessing, and mitigating preteen STBs and the development and validation of comprehensive risk assessment tools and practices explicitly designed for preteens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.