ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026
Perceptions of COVID-19 Vaccination During Pregnancy in a Cohort of US Adults (CHASING COVID) in 2023.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: Pregnant women are at higher risk of severe COVID-19, and vaccination significantly reduces the risk of severe infection. Despite its benefits, only 13% of pregnant women in the U.S. had received the updated 2024-25 vaccine by December 2024, with uptake varying across sociodemographic groups. This study examines perceptions on COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy among U.S. adults enrolled in the Chasing Covid Cohort, analyzing responses across 16 surveys between March 2020 and December 2023 (N=4488). Methods: Key variables included sociodemographic characteristics, susceptibility to severe COVID-19 disease, perceived worry about COVID-19, individual and household vaccination status, symptoms of anxiety and depression, trusted information sources, and having a regular healthcare provider. Perceptions of vaccine safety and efficacy during pregnancy were measured using five Likert-scale statements, categorized into agreement, uncertainty, and disagreement. Exploratory factor analysis identified two constructs-safety and efficacy-which were analyzed in relation to participant characteristics using bivariate analysis and chi-square tests, and multivariable robust Poisson regression models. Results: Among all respondents and women of reproductive age, less than half (40%) perceived the COVID-19 vaccine as safe during pregnancy, and just over half recognized its efficacy. Individuals with a personal physician and those who trusted public health institutions or healthcare providers were more inclined to agree with the vaccine's safety and efficacy. Conclusions: These findings highlight the influence of demographic factors on vaccine perceptions, the potential impact of social networks during pregnancy, and the critical role of trust in public health institutions in promoting vaccine uptake.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.