ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026
Divergent patterns of cognitive decline in preclinical Alzheimer's disease: implications for secondary prevention trials.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Alzheimer's disease biomarkers in cognitively unimpaired older adults are associated with later cognitive and clinical decline, yet substantial heterogeneity in the timing and rate of decline remains insufficiently characterized. This study aims to identify subgroups of cognitive decline among biomarker-defined cognitively unimpaired adults and determine baseline predictors of heterogeneity in preclinical Alzheimer's disease progression. Methods: Longitudinal data was analyzed from the Anti-Amyloid Treatment in Asymptomatic Alzheimer's Disease (A4) Study, which enrolled amyloid-positive participants, and the parallel LEARN Study, which enrolled amyloid-negative individuals meeting all other A4 criteria. Participants completed baseline amyloid PET, plasma P-tau217, structural MRI, and serial cognitive assessments. Latent Class Mixed-Effects Models (LCMMs) were used to identify distinct cognitive trajectory classes. Associations between class membership and demographic, clinical, and biomarker characteristics were evaluated. The primary outcome was longitudinal change in the Preclinical Alzheimer Cognitive Composite (PACC). Findings: Three cognitive trajectory classes were identified: stable, slow decliners, and fast decliners. Higher plasma P-tau217, smaller hippocampal volume, and elevated tau PET were associated with greater odds of belonging to declining classes. Among amyloid-positive individuals, approximately 70% were classified as stable over the observed follow-up interval. These stable individuals likely contribute little to the power of preclincal Alzheimer's trials. Interpretation: Latent class modeling reveals marked heterogeneity in preclinical cognitive trajectories, even among individuals with biomarker evidence of Alzheimer pathology. The high proportion of stable individuals, though consistent with the long presymptomatic interval, has important implications for prevention trial design, particularly regarding inclusion criteria, outcome measures, and treatment effect assumptions. Identifying subgroups of decline may improve prognostic modeling and guide enrichment strategies for precision secondary prevention trials. Funding: US National Institutes of Health, Eli Lilly, Alzheimer's Association, Foundation for the National Institutes of Health, GHR Foundation, Davis Alzheimer Prevention Program, Yugilbar Foundation, Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, Cogstate, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Foundation for Neurologic Diseases, and Epstein Family Foundation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.