Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41445640›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025

Transitions in cigarette and ENDS use in the PATH Study: a multistate transition model analysis of adults in 2021-2022 compared to previous years.

Andrew F Brouwer, Olivia K Roberts, Jihyoun Jeon, Evelyn Jimenez-Mendoza, Stephanie R Land, Neal D Freedman, Rossana Torres-Alvarez, Ritesh Mistry, David T Levy, Rafael Meza

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Andrew F BrouwerDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3779-5287
Olivia K RobertsDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID 0009-0009-1582-2174
Jihyoun JeonDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7003-3412
Evelyn Jimenez-MendozaDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3537-2520
Stephanie R LandTobacco Control Research Branch, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1632-1437
Neal D FreedmanTobacco Control Research Branch, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0074-1098
Rossana Torres-AlvarezDepartment of Population Health Sciences, BC Cancer Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Ritesh MistryDepartment of Health Behavior and Health Education, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
David T LevyDepartment of Oncology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, United States.
Rafael MezaDepartment of Population Health Sciences, BC Cancer Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1076-5037

Funding

Research Project 3: Modeling the Impact of Tobacco Control Policies on Polytobacco Use and Associated Health DisparitiesU54CA229974 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI David Mendez Emilien · 2018 to 2026
$39.2M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA229974
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) products continue to evolve, and so ongoing analysis of transition rates over time is important for tracking real-world associations between ENDS and cigarette use and for providing the information necessary to project future public health outcomes. Methods: Using the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study Waves 6-7 (2021-2022), we applied a Markov multistate transition model to estimate transition rates for initiation and cessation of each product. We estimated one-year transition probabilities for each transition. These results were compared to estimated rates and probabilities in Waves 1-6 (2014-2021). Results: The fraction adopting ENDS use in 2021-22 among those who had never previously established tobacco product use, those not currently using tobacco products, and those currently smoking cigarettes increased to 0.5% (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.4, 0.6%), 2.7% (95% CI: 2.3, 3.2%), and 6.8% (95% CI: 6.1, 7.6%), respectively. These increases were driven by young adults (ages 18-24), with respective transition fractions of 2.7% (95% CI: 2.3, 3.2%), 23.6% (95% CI: 20.2, 27.0%), and 19.2% (95% CI: 14.0, 24.5%). The fraction of adults who transitioned from dual cigarette and ENDS use to cigarette-only use remained around 25% (26.2% [95% CI: 21.7, 30.7%]), while the fraction who transitioned to ENDS-only use increased to 24.2% (95%CI: 20.5, 27.9%). The increase in the dual to ENDS-only use transition was also driven by young adults (34.4% [95% CI: 26.2, 42.6%]) and adults ages 25-34 (29.4% [95% CI: 23.1, 35.7%]). Conclusion: Public health efforts are needed to promote cigarette cessation among older adults, specifically.

Indexed as

cigarettedual useelectronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS)multistate transition modeltobaccotransition

Identifiers

PMID41445640
PMCPMC12723974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.