ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Linguistic Features from Paragraph Recall are Markers of Cognitive Impairment.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: Cognitive impairment is associated with language changes that may be elicited from verbal responses during neuropsychological assessments that are not captured in traditional scoring. The current study investigated the utility of a linguistic analysis of paragraph recall responses for differentiating participants with and without cognitive impairment. Methods: Digital voice recordings of Logical Memory (LM) were available from 598 participants from the Long Life Family Study with normal cognition and 112 with cognitive impairment. Linguistic polyfeature scores for immediate (PFS-IR) and delayed recall (PFS-DR) were created from a weighted sum of features associated with cognitive impairment. Logistic regression models assessed the predictive value of each PFS and demographics for classifying cognitive impairment. Repeated measures models with Generalized Estimating Equations assessed whether PFSs predict decline on a cognitive screener. Results: Both immediate and delayed PFSs were significantly associated with cognitive status (PFS-IR β = 0.05, Conclusion: Quantification of linguistic features from paragraph recall using a linguistic PFS provides sufficient information for detecting cognitive impairment and predicting incident cognitive decline. The linguistic PFS has the potential to be integrated into automated testing, recording, and scoring pipelines allowing for the implementation of sensitive neuropsychological assessments in broader clinical and research settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.