ArticlePlastic surgery (Oakville, Ont.)2025
A Simple and Feasible Earlobe Keloid Pressure Splint.
Article in Plastic surgery (Oakville, Ont.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Earlobe keloids are difficult to manage due to their high recurrence rates and the challenges of applying consistent compression over the ear's complex shape. Common treatments, including surgical excision, intralesional corticosteroid injections, cryotherapy, laser therapy, and radiotherapy, often have recurrence rates exceeding 50 percent when used alone. Combining surgical excision with adjuvant measures can significantly improve outcomes. We describe a novel, low cost, time efficient, and easily fabricated compression device used alongside core excision, low tension closure, and intralesional corticosteroids. Two 25-gauge syringe hubs are removed from the syringe and modified with cautery to create suture channels. They are soaked in chlorhexidine or alcohol, layered with xeroform gauze, and applied bilaterally to the earlobe using nylon sutures in a horizontal mattress or figure-of-eight configuration. Worn continuously for six months, the device delivers sustained, conforming compression, integrates recurrence-reducing principles, and offers a practical alternative to commercial or custom 3D printed devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.