SynthesisBiomolecules & biomedicine2025
Diagnostic and prognostic value of circulating microRNA-21 in heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Biomolecules & biomedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heart failure (HF) remains a leading cause of global mortality, underscoring the urgent need for reliable, minimally invasive biomarkers to facilitate early diagnosis and risk stratification. MicroRNA-21 (miR-21) has been implicated in cardiac fibrosis, hypertrophy, and the progression of HF; however, its clinical utility remains uncertain. This study presents a systematic review and diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) meta-analysis aimed at assessing the diagnostic and prognostic performance of circulating miR-21 in HF. We estimated pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) for the DTA analysis, and synthesized hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for prognostic outcomes. Additionally, univariate meta-regression was conducted to explore demographic and clinical moderators. Our analysis included fourteen studies with a total of 1,327 participants. Results demonstrated that circulating miR-21 levels were significantly elevated in HF patients compared to controls (fold change 1.61; 95% CI 1.46-1.78; p < 0.001). The diagnostic accuracy was notably high, with a sensitivity of 0.94 (95% CI 82.0-98.0), specificity of 0.90 (95% CI 79.0-96.0), and AUC of 0.97 (95% CI 96.0-98.0). Elevated levels of miR-21 were associated with an increased risk of worsening HF severity (HR 1.84; 95% CI 1.14-2.97; p=0.01) and HF-related cardiovascular death (HR 2.00; 95% CI 1.30-3.03; p=0.001). However, no significant association was found with HF-related hospitalization (HR 0.97; 95% CI 0.61-1.52; p=0.88). Variability in sample type and differing clinical thresholds contributed to heterogeneity across studies. These findings support the potential of circulating miR-21 as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for HF. Nevertheless, further research with standardized sample sizes and clinical thresholds is necessary to establish robust evidence for its clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.