Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41445009›Full record

ArticleSalud colectiva2025

[Intervention to promote regulatory compliance in food and nutrition education in public basic education schools in the central region of Mexico].

José Cutberto Hernández Ramírez

Abstract readComparative StudyEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Salud colectiva, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

José Cutberto Hernández RamírezDoctor of Health Sciences. Postdoctoral researcher, Secretaría de Ciencia, Humanidades, Tecnología e Innovación, Mexico City, Mexico. jose.hernandez@utrivieramaya.edu.mx.ORCID 0000-0002-9636-6810

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Food and nutrition education interventions in Mexican basic education schools have focused on conveying information and targeting children, but they overlook determinants of learning eating habits, such as compliance with or violation of official regulations on food offerings in schools. This article describes the results of an educational intervention aimed at promoting regulatory compliance favorable to food and nutrition education in four public basic education schools in the central region of Mexico, directed at teachers and cooks who shape the school food environment on a daily basis. A comparative case study was conducted from 2021 to 2023 through a series of thematic workshops with a constructivist approach, adapted to a previously reported diagnosis, and addressed to a total of 38 teachers, 8 cooks, and 105 occasional attendees (students' family members). The impact of the workshops was evaluated through an ex-post analysis of weaknesses, threats, strengths, and opportunities, as well as hypothesis testing on changes in the daily school menus offered. The consistent attendance of the same participants in the workshop sessions contributed to significant improvements in the nutritional quality of the menus offered, and the strategies generated in the workshops by teachers and cooks to intervene daily in their environment proved to be the most effective. Workshops with constantly changing attendees involved more members of the community but had less impact on regulatory compliance favorable to food and nutrition education.

Indexed as

Food ServicesHealth EducationSchoolsChildCookingHumansMexicoNutritive ValueSchool TeachersAccess to Healthy FoodsCommunitarian OrganizationCommunity ParticipationFood SecurityMexico

Identifiers

PMID41445009
PMCPMC12724425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.