ArticleBMC health services research2025
Healthcare professionals' perspectives on peer support in post-rehabilitation care for individuals with acquired brain injury: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAcquired brain injury (ABI) can pose significant challenges, particularly during the transition from rehabilitation to independent living. Peer support, provided by individuals with similar experiences, may enhance self-management, emotional well-being, and coping strategies. Understanding healthcare professionals' perspectives is essential for successful implementation in post-rehabilitation ABI care.
methodsThis qualitative study involved two focus groups with multidisciplinary healthcare professionals, including disciplines included rehabilitations specialists, physiotherapists, psychologists, social workers, speech therapists, and occupational therapists, from a Dutch rehabilitation unit. Discussions explored perceptions of integrating peer support. Data were analyzed thematically using Atlas.ti.
resultsEleven professionals participated, acknowledging the value of peer support in providing emotional validation, role modeling, and practical guidance. Peer supporters were seen as crucial in addressing ABI's invisible consequences, such as cognitive and emotional challenges. Concerns included professional boundaries, quality assurance, and peer supporter well-being. Emotional stability, cognitive skills, and self-awareness were identified as essential to prevent burnout. Clear matching criteria and structured coordination were deemed necessary. Training, role clarity, and professional supervision were highlighted as key factors for successful implementation.
conclusionsHealthcare professionals view peer support as a valuable addition to ABI care. Based on the findings of this qualitative study, a structured approach, including training, defined roles, intervision and supervision, is recommended to ensure safe and effective integration across the entire patient journey. Further research is needed to evaluate the effectiveness of peer-support interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.