ArticleInternational breastfeeding journal2025
Inhibiting and protective factors of exclusive breastfeeding in an Island population in Spain: a longitudinal study.
Article in International breastfeeding journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBreastfeeding provides important health benefits for both mothers and infants. In Spain, the rate of exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) at 6 months is 47%, which remains below the 60% target proposed by the World Health Organization for 2030. The objective of this study was to identify the protective and inhibiting factors associated with EBF in a population of pregnant women in Tenerife (Canary Islands, Spain).
methodsWe conducted a longitudinal, prospective study among women attending midwife consultations for pregnancy check-ups at a primary healthcare center between November 2018 and January 2021. We followed 83 women, collecting data at different time points during pregnancy and postpartum (hospital stay, 15 days, 1 month, 4 months, and 6 months). Descriptive statistics and univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed.
resultsThe inhibiting factors for EBF were pacifier use during the hospital stay, on EBF after birth (OR: 0.06, 95% CI: 0.02, 0.23), pacifier use at 15 days (OR: 0.13, 95% CI: 0.04, 0.42) and at 4 months (OR: 0.23, 95% CI: 0.07, 0.79), gynecological problems of the woman (OR: 0.14, 95% CI: 0.03, 0.61), the presence of nipple pain at 15 days affecting EBF at 4 months (OR: 0.18, 95% CI: 0.06, 0.56) and at 6 months (OR: 0.21, 95% CI: 0.07, 0.68), perception of insufficient milk at 15 days (OR: 0.15, 95% CI: 0.05, 0.49) and at 1 month (OR: 0.06, 95% CI: 0.02, 0.20), and giving birth in a privately managed hospital without Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI) accreditation (OR: 0.17, 95% CI: 0.05, 0.66). Protective factors for EBF were the woman’s prior knowledge of the benefits of breastfeeding for her child (OR: 5.25, 95% CI: 1.03, 26.80) and for herself (OR: 3.98, 95% CI: 1.31, 12.02), as well as having a foreign nationality (OR: 3.04, 95% CI: 1.05, 8.80).
conclusionsThe factors impacting EBF can be addressed with improved care practices for women during pregnancy, childbirth, and the early postpartum period. It is essential to train healthcare professionals and implement the BFHI in Spain, where it is primarily carried out in public hospitals, but not in private ones.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.