ArticleBMC ecology and evolution2025
Hybridization and introgression between two fig trees with contrasting ecological preferences.
Article in BMC ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Morphological and pomological diversity of fig (ficus carica l.) germplasm in North-Western India.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hybridization in plants with specialized pollination systems provides insights into the mechanisms of species boundary maintenance and breakdown. The significance of hybridization in the history of ecologically important fig trees is unclear. Ficus hispida and Ficus squamosa are dioecious species with contrasting habitats and dispersal mechanisms. We combined phenological, morphological and genomic analyses to characterize putative hybrids and interspecific gene flow. Overlapping fruiting periods during Thailand’s rainy season potentially allow reciprocal movement of pollinators between the two species. Putative hybrid individuals displayed intermediate morphological traits but had larger leaves. Genomic analyses using single nucleotide polymorphisms confirmed the hybrid status of individuals identified by their morphology. They also revealed patterns of genetic admixture with parent species. Phylogenetic analysis of chloroplast genomes also suggested historical introgression events between the two species. The hybrids were generally found in riparian areas habitats required by F. squamosa, where environmental conditions may be intermediate with the drier open conditions favored by F. hispida. Fig tree pollination depends on fig wasps that are generally host-species specific, but clearly some host switching occurs. Ficus squamosa has highly modified seeds adapted for dispersal by water, whereas F. hispida depends on seed dispersal by vertebrates. Aquatic-dispersal modifications are poorly developed in the hybrids, suggesting they require seed dispersal by frugivores. This study provides evidence of hybridization between two fig tree species with contrasting ecological preferences, but the evolutionary consequences of the inter-specific pollen-flow remain uncertain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.