Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41444935›Full record

ArticleBMC ecology and evolution2025

Hybridization and introgression between two fig trees with contrasting ecological preferences.

Ramil Kohkaew, Yamei Ding, Pornwiwan Pothasin, Nattaya Srisawad, Stephen G Compton, Hui Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ramil KohkaewState Key Laboratory of Plant Diversity and Specialty Crops, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510650, China.
Yamei DingState Key Laboratory of Plant Diversity and Specialty Crops, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510650, China.
Pornwiwan PothasinConservation Biology Program, School of Interdisciplinary, Mahidol University, Kanchanaburi Campus, Kanchanaburi, 71150, Thailand.
Nattaya SrisawadInsititute of Molecular Biosciences, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, 73170, Thailand.
Stephen G ComptonSchool of Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
Hui YuState Key Laboratory of Plant Diversity and Specialty Crops, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510650, China. yuhui@scbg.ac.cn.

Funding

National Key R & D Program of China 2023YFE0107400Science and Technology Projects in Guangzhou E33309The Alliance of International Science Organizations (ANSO) Scholarship for Young Talents 2022ANSOM001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hybridization in plants with specialized pollination systems provides insights into the mechanisms of species boundary maintenance and breakdown. The significance of hybridization in the history of ecologically important fig trees is unclear. Ficus hispida and Ficus squamosa are dioecious species with contrasting habitats and dispersal mechanisms. We combined phenological, morphological and genomic analyses to characterize putative hybrids and interspecific gene flow. Overlapping fruiting periods during Thailand’s rainy season potentially allow reciprocal movement of pollinators between the two species. Putative hybrid individuals displayed intermediate morphological traits but had larger leaves. Genomic analyses using single nucleotide polymorphisms confirmed the hybrid status of individuals identified by their morphology. They also revealed patterns of genetic admixture with parent species. Phylogenetic analysis of chloroplast genomes also suggested historical introgression events between the two species. The hybrids were generally found in riparian areas habitats required by F. squamosa, where environmental conditions may be intermediate with the drier open conditions favored by F. hispida. Fig tree pollination depends on fig wasps that are generally host-species specific, but clearly some host switching occurs. Ficus squamosa has highly modified seeds adapted for dispersal by water, whereas F. hispida depends on seed dispersal by vertebrates. Aquatic-dispersal modifications are poorly developed in the hybrids, suggesting they require seed dispersal by frugivores. This study provides evidence of hybridization between two fig tree species with contrasting ecological preferences, but the evolutionary consequences of the inter-specific pollen-flow remain uncertain.

Indexed as

FicusGene FlowGenetic IntrogressionHybridization, GeneticAnimalsEcosystemGenome, ChloroplastPhylogenyPollinationPolymorphism, Single NucleotideThailandFicus hispidaFicus squamosaHybridizationLeaf traitsRiparian area

Identifiers

PMID41444935
PMCPMC12729013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.